Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Dantes

174 A.3d 895, 456 Md. 459
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedDecember 6, 2017
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 45, Sept. Term, 2017
StatusPublished

This text of 174 A.3d 895 (Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Dantes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Dantes, 174 A.3d 895, 456 Md. 459 (Md. 2017).

Opinion

**459The Court of Appeals of Maryland, having consider the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission and Respondent, Phillip G. Dantes, to place Respondent on Inactive **460Status by Consent pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736(c), it is this 6th day of December, 2017;

ORDERED, that the Joint Petition be, and it is hereby GRANTED, and the Respondent, Phillip G. Dantes, is hereby placed on Inactive Status by consent; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Phillip G. Dantes from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 A.3d 895, 456 Md. 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-of-md-v-dantes-md-2017.