Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Adams

209 A.3d 135, 464 Md. 3
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMay 28, 2019
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 83, Sept. Term, 2018
StatusPublished

This text of 209 A.3d 135 (Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Adams, 209 A.3d 135, 464 Md. 3 (Md. 2019).

Opinion

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Scott Gregory Adams, to reprimand the Respondent by consent, it is this 28th day of May, 2019,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Scott Gregory Adams is hereby reprimanded as reciprocal discipline in Maryland for professional misconduct he committed in Maine, involving violations of Maine Rules of Professional Conduct 4.4(b) and 8.4(c) and (d) as adjudicated by a **4Grievance Commission panel and affirmed by the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, such conduct also having violated Rules 8.4(c) and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct then in effect.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 A.3d 135, 464 Md. 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-of-md-v-adams-md-2019.