Attorney Grievance Commission v. Zuckerman

875 A.2d 132, 387 Md. 326, 2005 Md. LEXIS 305
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided June 2, 2005·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 21·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Court having considered the petition for reinstatement of Charles J. Zuckerman and the response filed thereto in the above case by the Attorney Grievance Commission recommending Charles J. Zuckerman’s reinstatement, it is this 2nd day of June, 2005

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that the petition be, and it is hereby, GRANTED, and the petitioner, Charles J. Zuckerman is reinstated to the practice of law in this State, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court shall replace the name of Charles J. Zuckerman upon the register of attorneys entitled to practice law in this State and shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Zuckerman, 875 A.2d 132, 387 Md. 326, 2005 Md. LEXIS 305 (Md. 2005).

875 A.2d 132 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Zuckerman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Smith
177 A.3d 640 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2018)
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mahone
76 A.3d 1198 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2013)
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Colton-Bell
76 A.3d 1096 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2013)
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Stillwell
74 A.3d 728 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2013)
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Howell
73 A.3d 202 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2013)