Attorney Grievance Commission v. Zentz
This text of 807 A.2d 48 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Zentz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent submitted by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner, and Carl Edwin Zentz, Respondent. The Court having considered the Petition, it is this 19th day of September, 2002,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, Carl Edwin Zentz, be, and he hereby is, reprimanded for his violation of Rules 1.1, 1.2(d), 3.1, 3.3(a), 3.4(c), 5.5(b), and 8.4(a), (c) and (d) of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct by allowing a disbarred lawyer to prepare and file pleadings and papers in the United States Bankruptcy Court on behalf of a Limited Liability Corporation for which the disbarred lawyer was the managing member, and to sign Respondent’s name on those papers.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
807 A.2d 48, 371 Md. 152, 2002 Md. LEXIS 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-zentz-md-2002.