Attorney Grievance Commission v. Yap

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Yap

734 A.2d 1146, 355 Md. 354, 1999 Md. LEXIS 600

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedAugust 10, 1999

DocketMisc. AG No. 23

StatusPublished

This text of 734 A.2d 1146 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Yap) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Yap, 734 A.2d 1146, 355 Md. 354, 1999 Md. LEXIS 600 (Md. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition to suspend attorney from the practice of law filed in the above-entitled matter in accordance with Md. Rule 16-716 and, no response having been made to the show cause order by the respondent, it is this 10th day of August, 1999

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the petition to suspend be, and it is hereby, GRANTED and Ritz Robert Yap is suspended, effective immediately, from the practice of law until further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall forthwith strike the name of Ritz Robert Yap from the register of attorneys in this Court and shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State in accordance with Rule 16-713.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition to suspend attorney from the practice of law filed in the above-entitled matter in accordance with Md. Rule 16-716 and, no response having been made to the show cause order by the respondent, it is this 10th day of August, 1999

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the petition to suspend be, and it is hereby, GRANTED and Ritz Robert Yap is suspended, effective immediately, from the practice of law until further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall forthwith strike the name of Ritz Robert Yap from the register of attorneys in this Court and shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State in accordance with Rule 16-713.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

734 A.2d 1146, 355 Md. 354, 1999 Md. LEXIS 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-yap-md-1999.