Attorney Grievance Commission v. Worsham

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Worsham

893 A.2d 1119, 391 Md. 461, 2006 Md. LEXIS 114

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided March 8, 2006·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 2·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Court having considered the Petition for Disciplinary Action, the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law submitted by the hearing judge, the exceptions and recommendations of the parties filed hereto and the oral argument of counsel in the above-captioned case, it is this 8th day of March, 2006.

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the exceptions and recommendation of Bar Counsel be, and they are hereby, overruled, and the petition for disciplinary action is dismissed. Costs to be paid by the Attorney Grievance Commission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Court having considered the Petition for Disciplinary Action, the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law submitted by the hearing judge, the exceptions and recommendations of the parties filed hereto and the oral argument of counsel in the above-captioned case, it is this 8th day of March, 2006.

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the exceptions and recommendation of Bar Counsel be, and they are hereby, overruled, and the petition for disciplinary action is dismissed. Costs to be paid by the Attorney Grievance Commission.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Worsham, 893 A.2d 1119, 391 Md. 461, 2006 Md. LEXIS 114 (Md. 2006).

Pincite

893 A.2d 1119 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Worsham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.