Attorney Grievance Commission v. Worsham

893 A.2d 1119, 391 Md. 461, 2006 Md. LEXIS 114
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMarch 8, 2006
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 2
StatusPublished

This text of 893 A.2d 1119 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Worsham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Worsham, 893 A.2d 1119, 391 Md. 461, 2006 Md. LEXIS 114 (Md. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

The Court having considered the Petition for Disciplinary Action, the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law submitted by the hearing judge, the exceptions and recommendations of the parties filed hereto and the oral argument of counsel in the above-captioned case, it is this 8th day of March, 2006.

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the exceptions and recommendation of Bar Counsel be, and they are hereby, overruled, and the petition for disciplinary action is dismissed. Costs to be paid by the Attorney Grievance Commission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
893 A.2d 1119, 391 Md. 461, 2006 Md. LEXIS 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-worsham-md-2006.