Attorney Grievance Commission v. Woloszyn

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Woloszyn

98 A.3d 1032, 440 Md. 29, 2014 Md. LEXIS 601

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedSeptember 4, 2014

DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 17

StatusPublished

This text of 98 A.3d 1032 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Woloszyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Woloszyn, 98 A.3d 1032, 440 Md. 29, 2014 Md. LEXIS 601 (Md. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension By Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, in which Respondent acknowledged Petitioner can produce sufficient evidence to establish that Respondent committed professional misconduct in violation of Rules 8.1(b) and 8.4(a)-(d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct, it is this 4th day of September, 2014,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that John J. Woloszyn, Respondent, be, and he hereby is, indefinitely suspended by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court, in accordance with Rule 16-772(d), shall strike the name of John J. Woloszyn from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and the clerks of all courts in this State that the name of John J. Woloszyn has been so stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension By Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, in which Respondent acknowledged Petitioner can produce sufficient evidence to establish that Respondent committed professional misconduct in violation of Rules 8.1(b) and 8.4(a)-(d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct, it is this 4th day of September, 2014,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that John J. Woloszyn, Respondent, be, and he hereby is, indefinitely suspended by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court, in accordance with Rule 16-772(d), shall strike the name of John J. Woloszyn from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and the clerks of all courts in this State that the name of John J. Woloszyn has been so stricken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 A.3d 1032, 440 Md. 29, 2014 Md. LEXIS 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-woloszyn-md-2014.