Attorney Grievance Commission v. Wingerter

897 A.2d 820, 392 Md. 453, 2006 Md. LEXIS 249
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Attorney Grievance Commission v. Wingerter. Read the opinion of the Court — 400 Md. 214
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided May 4, 2006·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 71·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Petition for disciplinary or remedial action petitioner’s two supplements filed thereto in the above case against the respondent, Rex B. Wingerter, the respondent’s response to the show cause order, and oral argument conducted thereon, it is this 4th day of May, 2006

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the petition be, and it is hereby granted, and Rex B. Wingerter is suspended, effective immediately, from the practice of law in this State subject to further order of this Court, and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall forthwith strike the name of Rex B. Wingerter from the register of [454]*454attorneys in this Court and shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Wingerter, 897 A.2d 820, 392 Md. 453, 2006 Md. LEXIS 249 (Md. 2006).

897 A.2d 820 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Wingerter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.