Attorney Grievance Commission v. Whittle

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Whittle

131 A.3d 388, 446 Md. 253

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedFebruary 8, 2016

DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 50

StatusPublished

This text of 131 A.3d 388 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Whittle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Whittle, 131 A.3d 388, 446 Md. 253 (Md. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent, and the Court having considered same,

NOW, THEREFORE, it is this 8th day of February, 2016,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Arthur John Whittle, Respondent, is hereby reprimanded for engaging in professional misconduct that violated Rules 1.4(a)(2) and 8.1(b) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent, and the Court having considered same,

NOW, THEREFORE, it is this 8th day of February, 2016,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Arthur John Whittle, Respondent, is hereby reprimanded for engaging in professional misconduct that violated Rules 1.4(a)(2) and 8.1(b) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 A.3d 388, 446 Md. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-whittle-md-2016.