Attorney Grievance Commission v. White

27 A.3d 564, 421 Md. 553, 2011 Md. LEXIS 567
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedSeptember 9, 2011
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 66
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 27 A.3d 564 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. White, 27 A.3d 564, 421 Md. 553, 2011 Md. LEXIS 567 (Md. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

ORDER.

Upon consideration of the petition for disciplinary or remedial action filed in the above entitled matter in accordance with Md. Rule 16-773, the responses to the show cause order, and oral argument presented at a hearing held before this Court on September 1, 2011, it is this 9th day of September, 2011

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the petition be, and it is hereby granted, and Lucille Saundra White is disbarred, effective immediately, from the practice of law in this State; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall forthwith strike the name of Lucille Saundra White from the register of attorneys in this Court and shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State in accordance with Rule 16-760(e).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. White
27 A.3d 564 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 A.3d 564, 421 Md. 553, 2011 Md. LEXIS 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-white-md-2011.