Attorney Grievance Commission v. Wall

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Wall

34 A.3d 498, 424 Md. 93, 2011 Md. LEXIS 779

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedDecember 21, 2011

DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 46

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.3d 498 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Wall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Wall, 34 A.3d 498, 424 Md. 93, 2011 Md. LEXIS 779 (Md. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Court of Appeals of Maryland, having considered the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission and Respondent, Thomas D. Wall, to place Respondent on Inactive Status By Consent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 21st day of December, 2011;

ORDERED, that the Joint Petition be, and it is hereby GRANTED, and the Respondent, Thomas D. Wall, is hereby placed on Inactive Status by consent; and,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Thomas D. Wall from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-772(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Court of Appeals of Maryland, having considered the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission and Respondent, Thomas D. Wall, to place Respondent on Inactive Status By Consent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 21st day of December, 2011;

ORDERED, that the Joint Petition be, and it is hereby GRANTED, and the Respondent, Thomas D. Wall, is hereby placed on Inactive Status by consent; and,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Thomas D. Wall from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-772(d).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.3d 498, 424 Md. 93, 2011 Md. LEXIS 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-wall-md-2011.