Attorney Grievance Commission v. Varnado
This text of 103 A.3d 1045 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Varnado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Court of Appeals of Maryland, having considered the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension By Consent of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Sean A. Varnado, Esq., in which Petitioner and Respondent agreed that Respondent violated Rules 1.15(b), and 8.4(a) and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct as well as Maryland Rules 16-607 and 16-609, (no client trust funds were involved in the misconduct underlying these violations), it is this 1st day of December, 2014
ORDERED, that Respondent be, and hereby is Indefinitely Suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Respondent shall not apply for reinstatement of his right to practice law earlier than ninety (90) days from the commencement of the suspension; and it is further
*679 ORDERED, that, the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Sean A. Varnado from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-772(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 A.3d 1045, 440 Md. 678, 2014 Md. LEXIS 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-varnado-md-2014.