Attorney Grievance Commission v. Vares

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Vares

977 A.2d 1016, 410 Md. 125, 2009 Md. LEXIS 623

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedAugust 14, 2009

DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 23

StatusPublished

This text of 977 A.2d 1016 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Vares) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Vares, 977 A.2d 1016, 410 Md. 125, 2009 Md. LEXIS 623 (Md. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter previously came before the Court on a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action filed by the Attorney [126]*126Grievance Commission of Maryland pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-771. On October 31, 2006, this Court entered an Order suspending Christopher K. Vares, Respondent, effective immediately, from the practice of law in this State subject to further order of this Court.

Now before the Court is the parties’ Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension by Consent, wherein they agree the respondent should remain suspended indefinitely as the final disposition of the disciplinary or remedial action filed under Rule 16-771. Having considered said joint petition, it is this 14th day of August, 2009,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Christopher K. Vares shall remain suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in this State; and it is further

ORDERED, that this order constitutes the final disposition of this disciplinary or remedial proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter previously came before the Court on a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action filed by the Attorney [126]*126Grievance Commission of Maryland pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-771. On October 31, 2006, this Court entered an Order suspending Christopher K. Vares, Respondent, effective immediately, from the practice of law in this State subject to further order of this Court.

Now before the Court is the parties’ Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension by Consent, wherein they agree the respondent should remain suspended indefinitely as the final disposition of the disciplinary or remedial action filed under Rule 16-771. Having considered said joint petition, it is this 14th day of August, 2009,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Christopher K. Vares shall remain suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in this State; and it is further

ORDERED, that this order constitutes the final disposition of this disciplinary or remedial proceeding.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

977 A.2d 1016, 410 Md. 125, 2009 Md. LEXIS 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-vares-md-2009.