Attorney Grievance Commission v. Vares

977 A.2d 1016, 410 Md. 125, 2009 Md. LEXIS 623
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided August 14, 2009·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 23·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This matter previously came before the Court on a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action filed by the Attorney [126] Grievance Commission of Maryland pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-771. On October 31, 2006, this Court entered an Order suspending Christopher K. Vares, Respondent, effective immediately, from the practice of law in this State subject to further order of this Court.

Now before the Court is the parties’ Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension by Consent, wherein they agree the respondent should remain suspended indefinitely as the final disposition of the disciplinary or remedial action filed under Rule 16-771. Having considered said joint petition, it is this 14th day of August, 2009,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Christopher K. Vares shall remain suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in this State; and it is further

ORDERED, that this order constitutes the final disposition of this disciplinary or remedial proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Vares, 977 A.2d 1016, 410 Md. 125, 2009 Md. LEXIS 623 (Md. 2009).

977 A.2d 1016 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Vares) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.