Attorney Grievance Commission v. Vanzego
This text of 162 A.3d 247 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Vanzego) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Court of Appeals of Maryland, having considered the Joint Petition For Indefinite Suspension By Consent of the Petitioner, filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Raymond Jerome Vanzego, Jr., Esquire, it is this 16th day of June, 2017,
ORDERED, that Respondent be, and hereby is, Indefinitely Suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland with a right to apply for reinstatement no sooner than ninety (90) days from the effective date of his indefinite suspension for violation of Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct 1.4, 1.15 and Maryland Rules 16-606.1, 16-607(a), 16-609(b), in effect at the time of the occurrence; and it is further,
ORDERED, that Respondent’s indefinite suspension shall become effective at 5:00 p.m. on June 28, 2017 and it is further,
ORDERED, that, the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Raymond Jerome Vanzego, Jr., from the register of attorneys in this Court, notify Respondent of the filing of this order in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-742(a)(l), and comply with the notice provisions set forth in Maryland Rule 19—761(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 A.3d 247, 453 Md. 351, 2017 WL 2617135, 2017 Md. LEXIS 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-vanzego-md-2017.