Attorney Grievance Commission v. Tuma

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Tuma

70 A.3d 308, 433 Md. 104, 2013 WL 3794315, 2013 Md. LEXIS 463

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedJuly 22, 2013

DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 102

StatusPublished

This text of 70 A.3d 308 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Tuma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Tuma, 70 A.3d 308, 433 Md. 104, 2013 WL 3794315, 2013 Md. LEXIS 463 (Md. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Court of Appeals of Maryland, having considered the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Mary[105]*105land and the Respondent, Malik James Tuma, to reprimand the Respondent, it is this 22nd day of July, 2013;

ORDERED, that the Joint Petition be, and it is hereby GRANTED, and the Respondent, Malik James Tuma, is reprimanded by consent for violating Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct 8.1(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Court of Appeals of Maryland, having considered the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Mary[105]*105land and the Respondent, Malik James Tuma, to reprimand the Respondent, it is this 22nd day of July, 2013;

ORDERED, that the Joint Petition be, and it is hereby GRANTED, and the Respondent, Malik James Tuma, is reprimanded by consent for violating Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct 8.1(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.3d 308, 433 Md. 104, 2013 WL 3794315, 2013 Md. LEXIS 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-tuma-md-2013.