Attorney Grievance Commission v. Tilly

156 A.3d 145, 452 Md. 45, 2017 WL 1026601, 2017 Md. LEXIS 138
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided March 16, 2017·No. 17ag/16·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension by Consent, it is this 16th day of March, 2017,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-736, that Respondent, Elena Tilly, an attorney not admitted to practice in this state, is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Maryland based on her acknowledgement that sufficient evidence could be produced to establish that she committed professional misconduct violating Rules 1.1, 1.15(d) and (e), 3.3(a), 5.3(a),(b),(c), and (d), 5.5(b), 7.1(a) and (b), 7.5(b), and 8.4(a)(c) and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct in effect prior to July 1, 2016; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court is directed to place the name of Elena Tilly on the list maintained in this Court of non-admitted attorneys who are excluded from exercising in any manner the privilege of practicing law in this State, to forward copies of this order in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-742(g)(l), and to give the notice required by Rule 19-707(e).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Tilly, 156 A.3d 145, 452 Md. 45, 2017 WL 1026601, 2017 Md. LEXIS 138 (Md. 2017).

156 A.3d 145 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Tilly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.