Attorney Grievance Commission v. Tilly

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Tilly

156 A.3d 145, 452 Md. 45, 2017 WL 1026601, 2017 Md. LEXIS 138

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedMarch 16, 2017

Docket17ag/16

StatusPublished

This text of 156 A.3d 145 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Tilly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Tilly, 156 A.3d 145, 452 Md. 45, 2017 WL 1026601, 2017 Md. LEXIS 138 (Md. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension by Consent, it is this 16th day of March, 2017,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-736, that Respondent, Elena Tilly, an attorney not admitted to practice in this state, is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Maryland based on her acknowledgement that sufficient evidence could be produced to establish that she committed professional misconduct violating Rules 1.1, 1.15(d) and (e), 3.3(a), 5.3(a),(b),(c), and (d), 5.5(b), 7.1(a) and (b), 7.5(b), and 8.4(a)(c) and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct in effect prior to July 1, 2016; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court is directed to place the name of Elena Tilly on the list maintained in this Court of non-admitted attorneys who are excluded from exercising in any manner the privilege of practicing law in this State, to forward copies of this order in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-742(g)(l), and to give the notice required by Rule 19-707(e).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension by Consent, it is this 16th day of March, 2017,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-736, that Respondent, Elena Tilly, an attorney not admitted to practice in this state, is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Maryland based on her acknowledgement that sufficient evidence could be produced to establish that she committed professional misconduct violating Rules 1.1, 1.15(d) and (e), 3.3(a), 5.3(a),(b),(c), and (d), 5.5(b), 7.1(a) and (b), 7.5(b), and 8.4(a)(c) and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct in effect prior to July 1, 2016; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court is directed to place the name of Elena Tilly on the list maintained in this Court of non-admitted attorneys who are excluded from exercising in any manner the privilege of practicing law in this State, to forward copies of this order in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-742(g)(l), and to give the notice required by Rule 19-707(e).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 A.3d 145, 452 Md. 45, 2017 WL 1026601, 2017 Md. LEXIS 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-tilly-md-2017.