Attorney Grievance Commission v. Tan

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Tan

146 A.3d 459, 450 Md. 96

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedSeptember 22, 2016

DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 39

StatusPublished

This text of 146 A.3d 459 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Tan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Tan, 146 A.3d 459, 450 Md. 96 (Md. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Joint Consent Motion for Suspension, it is this 22nd day of September, 2016,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-737, that Respondent Jing Tan, Esquire, is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Maryland for sixty (60) days based on her misconduct involving the former Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct (MLRPC) 1.1,1.4,1.6, 1.6(a), 1.15(a), 7.1(a) and 8.4(a) and (d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Joint Consent Motion for Suspension, it is this 22nd day of September, 2016,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-737, that Respondent Jing Tan, Esquire, is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Maryland for sixty (60) days based on her misconduct involving the former Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct (MLRPC) 1.1,1.4,1.6, 1.6(a), 1.15(a), 7.1(a) and 8.4(a) and (d).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 A.3d 459, 450 Md. 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-tan-md-2016.