Attorney Grievance Commission v. Sutton

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Sutton

710 A.2d 266, 350 Md. 3, 1998 Md. LEXIS 1076

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided May 27, 1998·No. Misc. AG No. 13·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Consent to Disbarment from the practice of law filed by William R. Sutton, Jr. in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-712 d2, and the written recommendation of Bar Counsel, it is this 27th day of May, 1998

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that William R. Sutton, Jr., be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of William R. Sutton, Jr. from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-713, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Consent to Disbarment from the practice of law filed by William R. Sutton, Jr. in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-712 d2, and the written recommendation of Bar Counsel, it is this 27th day of May, 1998

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that William R. Sutton, Jr., be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of William R. Sutton, Jr. from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-713, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Sutton, 710 A.2d 266, 350 Md. 3, 1998 Md. LEXIS 1076 (Md. 1998).

Pincite

710 A.2d 266 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Sutton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.