Attorney Grievance Commission v. Stoffan

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Stoffan

994 A.2d 453, 413 Md. 676, 2010 Md. LEXIS 179

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided May 10, 2010·No. Misc. Docket AG, No. 75·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 10th day of May, 2010

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Philip M. Stoffan be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland effective immediately; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Philip M. Stoffan from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that fact to [677] the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 10th day of May, 2010

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Philip M. Stoffan be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland effective immediately; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Philip M. Stoffan from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that fact to [677] the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Stoffan, 994 A.2d 453, 413 Md. 676, 2010 Md. LEXIS 179 (Md. 2010).

Pincite

994 A.2d 453 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Stoffan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related