Attorney Grievance Commission v. Stern

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Stern

815 A.2d 378, 372 Md. 686

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedJanuary 24, 2003

DocketMisc. AG No. 34

StatusPublished

This text of 815 A.2d 378 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Stern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Stern, 815 A.2d 378, 372 Md. 686 (Md. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent submitted by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner, and Gary Francis Stern, Respondent. The Court having considered the Petition, it is this 24th day of January, 2003,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, Gary Francis Stern, be, and he is hereby, reprimanded for his violation of Rules 1.2(a), 1.7(b) and 1.15 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct, and Maryland Rule 16-607 by his improper handling of client funds.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent submitted by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner, and Gary Francis Stern, Respondent. The Court having considered the Petition, it is this 24th day of January, 2003,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, Gary Francis Stern, be, and he is hereby, reprimanded for his violation of Rules 1.2(a), 1.7(b) and 1.15 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct, and Maryland Rule 16-607 by his improper handling of client funds.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

815 A.2d 378, 372 Md. 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-stern-md-2003.