Attorney Grievance Commission v. Stern

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Stern

799 A.2d 396, 369 Md. 256, 2002 Md. LEXIS 338

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided May 31, 2002·No. Misc. AG No. 65·Published

Opinion

ORDER

ELDRIDGE, J.

The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. Upon review of said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 31st day of May, 2002.

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Nathan .Stem, be and he is hereby, reprimanded; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Respondent shall attend the MIC-PEL/MSBA course titled “Practice Perfect, How to Avoid [257] Grievance and Malpractice” scheduled for June 7, 2002 and that Respondent shall provide proof of attendance to the Office of Bar Counsel within thirty (30) days of completion of that course.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

ELDRIDGE, J.

The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. Upon review of said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 31st day of May, 2002.

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Nathan .Stem, be and he is hereby, reprimanded; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Respondent shall attend the MIC-PEL/MSBA course titled “Practice Perfect, How to Avoid [257] Grievance and Malpractice” scheduled for June 7, 2002 and that Respondent shall provide proof of attendance to the Office of Bar Counsel within thirty (30) days of completion of that course.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Stern, 799 A.2d 396, 369 Md. 256, 2002 Md. LEXIS 338 (Md. 2002).

Pincite

799 A.2d 396 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Stern) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.