Attorney Grievance Commission v. Steinberg

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Steinberg

949 A.2d 619, 405 Md. 9, 2008 Md. LEXIS 308

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided June 3, 2008·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 79·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 3rd day of June, 2008,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Jonathan A. Steinberg, be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Jonathan A. Steinberg from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 3rd day of June, 2008,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Jonathan A. Steinberg, be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Jonathan A. Steinberg from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Steinberg, 949 A.2d 619, 405 Md. 9, 2008 Md. LEXIS 308 (Md. 2008).

Pincite

949 A.2d 619 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Steinberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related