Attorney Grievance Commission v. Sniffen

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Sniffen

50 A.3d 8, 427 Md. 521, 2012 WL 3376102, 2012 Md. LEXIS 454

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided August 15, 2012·No. Misc. Docket AG, No. 25·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 15th day of August, 2012,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Kevin Edward Sniffen is hereby disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Kevin Edward Sniffen from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 15th day of August, 2012,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Kevin Edward Sniffen is hereby disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Kevin Edward Sniffen from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Sniffen, 50 A.3d 8, 427 Md. 521, 2012 WL 3376102, 2012 Md. LEXIS 454 (Md. 2012).

Pincite

50 A.3d 8 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Sniffen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related