Attorney Grievance Commission v. Siejack
This text of 5 A.3d 60 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Siejack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension By Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 28th day of September, 2010,
[72]*72ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Richard T. Siejack be, and he hereby is, indefinitely suspended by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective November 1, 2010, with a right to petition for reinstatement no sooner than six months from the effective date of the suspension; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court, on November 1, 2010, shall strike the name of Richard T. Siejack from the register of attorneys in this Court and, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d), shall certify to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the state that the name of Richard T. Siejack has been so stricken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 A.3d 60, 416 Md. 71, 2010 Md. LEXIS 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-siejack-md-2010.