Attorney Grievance Commission v. Shurberg

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Shurberg

822 A.2d 1211, 374 Md. 338, 2003 Md. LEXIS 244

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided May 6, 2003·No. Misc. Docket AG, No. 18·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

ORDER

The Court having considered the petition for disciplinary action, Recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law, petitioner’s exceptions and recommendations and the oral arguments of counsel, it is this 6th day of May, 2003.

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of Court concurring, that the charges filed against the respondent, Jonathan Seth Shurberg as set forth in the petition for disciplinary action be, and it is hereby DISMISSED. Costs to be paid by Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

ORDER

The Court having considered the petition for disciplinary action, Recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law, petitioner’s exceptions and recommendations and the oral arguments of counsel, it is this 6th day of May, 2003.

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of Court concurring, that the charges filed against the respondent, Jonathan Seth Shurberg as set forth in the petition for disciplinary action be, and it is hereby DISMISSED. Costs to be paid by Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Shurberg, 822 A.2d 1211, 374 Md. 338, 2003 Md. LEXIS 244 (Md. 2003).

Pincite

822 A.2d 1211 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Shurberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.