Attorney Grievance Commission v. Shapiro

124 A.3d 1128, 445 Md. 114, 2015 Md. LEXIS 788
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Attorney Grievance Commission v. Shapiro. Read the opinion of the Court — 441 Md. 367
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided November 3, 2015·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 0067·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment By-Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 3rd day of November, 2015,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Eugene Alan Shapiro, who was indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland by a prior Opinion and Order of this Court filed January 30, 2015, is hereby disbarred by consent for additional professional misconduct in violation of Rules 1.1, 1.2(a), 1.3, 1.4, 1.16(a) & (d), 8.1(a) & (b) and 8.4(a), (c) & (d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court, in accordance with Rule 16-772(d), shall certify the disbarment of Eugene Alan Shapiro to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and the clerks of all courts in this State; and it is further

ORDERED, that judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against Eugene Alan Shapiro in the amount of $910.95.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Shapiro, 124 A.3d 1128, 445 Md. 114, 2015 Md. LEXIS 788 (Md. 2015).

124 A.3d 1128 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Shapiro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.