Attorney Grievance Commission v. Seward

89 A.3d 152, 437 Md. 609, 2014 WL 1327475, 2014 Md. LEXIS 204
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedApril 2, 2014
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 107
StatusPublished

This text of 89 A.3d 152 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Seward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Seward, 89 A.3d 152, 437 Md. 609, 2014 WL 1327475, 2014 Md. LEXIS 204 (Md. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

This Court having considered the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension by Consent, with Right to Apply for Reinstatement After Ninety (90) Days, filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 2nd day of April, 2014,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Jamie Blum Seward be, and she hereby is, indefinitely suspended, effective immediately, by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Respondent may apply for reinstatement after ninety (90) days from the date this Order is entered, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Jamie Blum Seward from the register of attorneys in this Court, and shall certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 A.3d 152, 437 Md. 609, 2014 WL 1327475, 2014 Md. LEXIS 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-seward-md-2014.