Attorney Grievance Commission v. Selby

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Selby

636 A.2d 480, 333 Md. 581, 1994 Md. LEXIS 206

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedFebruary 3, 1994

DocketMisc. (Subtitle BV) No. 7

StatusPublished

This text of 636 A.2d 480 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Selby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Selby, 636 A.2d 480, 333 Md. 581, 1994 Md. LEXIS 206 (Md. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Recommendation For Sanction after hearing of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent to reprimand the Respondent by consent. Upon consideration of said recommendation, it is this 3rd day of February, 1994,

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Terri Taylor Selby, be and she is hereby reprimanded. It is further,

ORDERED, that the Respondent shall pay to the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland $1,398.75, the costs of the investigation and prosecution of this matter, for which amount judgment is entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, on a schedule to be determined by agreement of the parties. Agreement to said schedule shall not be unreasonably withheld.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Recommendation For Sanction after hearing of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent to reprimand the Respondent by consent. Upon consideration of said recommendation, it is this 3rd day of February, 1994,

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Terri Taylor Selby, be and she is hereby reprimanded. It is further,

ORDERED, that the Respondent shall pay to the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland $1,398.75, the costs of the investigation and prosecution of this matter, for which amount judgment is entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, on a schedule to be determined by agreement of the parties. Agreement to said schedule shall not be unreasonably withheld.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

636 A.2d 480, 333 Md. 581, 1994 Md. LEXIS 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-selby-md-1994.