Attorney Grievance Commission v. Schramm

55 A.3d 663, 429 Md. 216
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedOctober 25, 2012
DocketMisc. Docket AG Nos. 55, 76
StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.3d 663 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Schramm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Schramm, 55 A.3d 663, 429 Md. 216 (Md. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent of the Attorney Grievance Commission and Respondent, Clayton Henry Schramm, Esquire, to disbar the Respondent from the practice of law. The Court having considered the Petition, it is this 25th day of October, 2012,

ORDERED, that Respondent, Clayton Henry Schramm, be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED, that, upon entry of this Order, the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Clayton Henry Schramm from the register of attorneys, and, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d), shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 A.3d 663, 429 Md. 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-schramm-md-2012.