Attorney Grievance Commission v. Russell

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Russell

85 A.3d 878, 437 Md. 331, 2014 WL 808943, 2014 Md. LEXIS 138

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided February 27, 2014·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 58·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Joint Petition for Reprimand By Consent, and the Court having considered same,

NOW, THEREFORE, it is this 27th day of February, 2014,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Susan Whittington Russell, Respondent in the captioned disciplinary proceeding, is hereby reprimanded for engaging in professional misconduct that violated Rule 8.4(d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Joint Petition for Reprimand By Consent, and the Court having considered same,

NOW, THEREFORE, it is this 27th day of February, 2014,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Susan Whittington Russell, Respondent in the captioned disciplinary proceeding, is hereby reprimanded for engaging in professional misconduct that violated Rule 8.4(d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Russell, 85 A.3d 878, 437 Md. 331, 2014 WL 808943, 2014 Md. LEXIS 138 (Md. 2014).

Pincite

85 A.3d 878 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.