Attorney Grievance Commission v. Russell

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Russell

85 A.3d 878, 437 Md. 331, 2014 WL 808943, 2014 Md. LEXIS 138

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedFebruary 27, 2014

DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 58

StatusPublished

This text of 85 A.3d 878 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Russell, 85 A.3d 878, 437 Md. 331, 2014 WL 808943, 2014 Md. LEXIS 138 (Md. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Joint Petition for Reprimand By Consent, and the Court having considered same,

NOW, THEREFORE, it is this 27th day of February, 2014,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Susan Whittington Russell, Respondent in the captioned disciplinary proceeding, is hereby reprimanded for engaging in professional misconduct that violated Rule 8.4(d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Joint Petition for Reprimand By Consent, and the Court having considered same,

NOW, THEREFORE, it is this 27th day of February, 2014,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Susan Whittington Russell, Respondent in the captioned disciplinary proceeding, is hereby reprimanded for engaging in professional misconduct that violated Rule 8.4(d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 A.3d 878, 437 Md. 331, 2014 WL 808943, 2014 Md. LEXIS 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-russell-md-2014.