Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ross

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ross

152 A.3d 166, 451 Md. 54

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedJanuary 13, 2017

DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 81

StatusPublished

This text of 152 A.3d 166 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ross, 152 A.3d 166, 451 Md. 54 (Md. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on the presentation of a certified copy of the Order of the New Hampshire Supreme Court dated September 19, 2016 wherein Brandon D. Ross was disbarred from the practice of law in the State of New Hampshire; and it appearing that Brandon D. Ross is also a member of the Bar of this Court; it is this 13th day of January, 2017,

ORDERED by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, Brandon D. Ross, be, and he is hereby, indefinitely suspended, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland, pending further order of this Court, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19—737(d); and it is further,

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name Brandon D. Ross from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rules 19—737(i) and 19-761(b) shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on the presentation of a certified copy of the Order of the New Hampshire Supreme Court dated September 19, 2016 wherein Brandon D. Ross was disbarred from the practice of law in the State of New Hampshire; and it appearing that Brandon D. Ross is also a member of the Bar of this Court; it is this 13th day of January, 2017,

ORDERED by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, Brandon D. Ross, be, and he is hereby, indefinitely suspended, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland, pending further order of this Court, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19—737(d); and it is further,

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name Brandon D. Ross from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rules 19—737(i) and 19-761(b) shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 A.3d 166, 451 Md. 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-ross-md-2017.