Attorney Grievance Commission v. Rodgers

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Rodgers

871 A.2d 589, 386 Md. 87, 2005 Md. LEXIS 176

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedApril 5, 2005

DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 86

StatusPublished

This text of 871 A.2d 589 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Rodgers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Rodgers, 871 A.2d 589, 386 Md. 87, 2005 Md. LEXIS 176 (Md. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Suspension of Respondent, by Consent, for thirty (30) days filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 5th day of April, 2005,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that David A. Rodgers, be, and is hereby, suspended for a period of thirty (30) days from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective Monday, May 16, 2005, and it is further,

[88]*88ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of David A. Rodgers from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16 — 772(d) shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Suspension of Respondent, by Consent, for thirty (30) days filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 5th day of April, 2005,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that David A. Rodgers, be, and is hereby, suspended for a period of thirty (30) days from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective Monday, May 16, 2005, and it is further,

[88]*88ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of David A. Rodgers from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16 — 772(d) shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

871 A.2d 589, 386 Md. 87, 2005 Md. LEXIS 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-rodgers-md-2005.