Attorney Grievance Commission v. Robinson
This text of 89 A.3d 534 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Court having considered the Joint Motion to Withdraw Respondent’s Objections and Impose Sanction Recommended by Petitioner, it is this 10th day of April, 2014,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Motion be, and it is hereby, GRANTED, and that Respondent, Kenneth M. Robinson, be and he is hereby, suspended from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland for a period of seven (7) months; and
ORDERED, that said suspension commenced, nunc pro tunc, on October 18, 2013; and
ORDERED, that Respondent’s right to apply for reinstatement is conditioned on his reinstatement to the practice of law in the District of Columbia; and
ORDERED, that Respondent shall file a Petition for Reinstatement in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-781 and obtain an Order from this Court reinstating his right to practice law in Maryland prior to engaging in any activities in Maryland that would constitute the practice of law in Maryland; and
*617 ORDERED, that Respondent’s previous filings opposing Petitioner’s recommendation for sanction are hereby withdrawn.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 A.3d 534, 437 Md. 616, 2014 WL 1407729, 2014 Md. LEXIS 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-robinson-md-2014.