Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ring

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ring

92 A.3d 543, 438 Md. 692, 2014 Md. LEXIS 361

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided May 28, 2014·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 116·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Kevin Anthony Ring, Esquire, to disbar the Respondent from the practice of law.

The Court having considered this Petition, it is this 28th day of May, 2014.

[693] ORDERED, that Respondent, Kevin Anthony Ring, be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland.

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Kevin Anthony Ring, from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-772(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Kevin Anthony Ring, Esquire, to disbar the Respondent from the practice of law.

The Court having considered this Petition, it is this 28th day of May, 2014.

[693] ORDERED, that Respondent, Kevin Anthony Ring, be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland.

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Kevin Anthony Ring, from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-772(d).

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ring, 92 A.3d 543, 438 Md. 692, 2014 Md. LEXIS 361 (Md. 2014).

Pincite

92 A.3d 543 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.