Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ring

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ring

92 A.3d 543, 438 Md. 692, 2014 Md. LEXIS 361

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedMay 28, 2014

DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 116

StatusPublished

This text of 92 A.3d 543 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ring, 92 A.3d 543, 438 Md. 692, 2014 Md. LEXIS 361 (Md. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Kevin Anthony Ring, Esquire, to disbar the Respondent from the practice of law.

The Court having considered this Petition, it is this 28th day of May, 2014.

[693]*693ORDERED, that Respondent, Kevin Anthony Ring, be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland.

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Kevin Anthony Ring, from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-772(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Kevin Anthony Ring, Esquire, to disbar the Respondent from the practice of law.

The Court having considered this Petition, it is this 28th day of May, 2014.

[693]*693ORDERED, that Respondent, Kevin Anthony Ring, be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland.

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Kevin Anthony Ring, from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-772(d).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 A.3d 543, 438 Md. 692, 2014 Md. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-ring-md-2014.