Attorney Grievance Commission v. Pratz

146 A.3d 459, 450 Md. 95, 2016 Md. LEXIS 589
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedSeptember 22, 2016
Docket24ag/16
StatusPublished

This text of 146 A.3d 459 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Pratz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Pratz, 146 A.3d 459, 450 Md. 95, 2016 Md. LEXIS 589 (Md. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission and the Respondent, Robert Paul Pratz to indefinitely suspend the Respondent from the practice of law with the right to reapply in one year, provided restitution is paid in full, for violations of Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.5, 1.8(h), 1.15,1.16(d), 8.4(a) and 8.4(d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct, in effect at the time of misconduct. The Court having considered the Joint Petition, it is this 22nd day of September, 2016;

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Respondent, Robert Paul Pratz, be and he is hereby indefi *96 nitely suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland with the right to reapply in one year; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Robert Paul Pratz from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-736(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 A.3d 459, 450 Md. 95, 2016 Md. LEXIS 589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-pratz-md-2016.