Attorney Grievance Commission v. Peklo

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Peklo

115 A.3d 1262, 443 Md. 230, 2015 Md. LEXIS 407

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedJune 9, 2015

Docket105ag/14

StatusPublished

This text of 115 A.3d 1262 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Peklo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Peklo, 115 A.3d 1262, 443 Md. 230, 2015 Md. LEXIS 407 (Md. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This Court having considered the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension by Consent, with Right to Apply for Reinstatement After Thirty (30) Days, filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 9th day of June, 2015,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Gary Stewart Peklo be, and he is hereby, indefinitely suspended by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, for violating Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct 1.7(a)(2), 1.15(a) and 8.4(d), and it is further

ORDERED, that the Respondent may apply for reinstatement after thirty (30) days from the date this Order is entered, conditioned upon Respondent having repaid the $30,600 to the Lentz Estate, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Gary Stewart Peklo from the register of attorneys in this Court, and shall certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of Maryland and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This Court having considered the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension by Consent, with Right to Apply for Reinstatement After Thirty (30) Days, filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 9th day of June, 2015,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Gary Stewart Peklo be, and he is hereby, indefinitely suspended by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, for violating Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct 1.7(a)(2), 1.15(a) and 8.4(d), and it is further

ORDERED, that the Respondent may apply for reinstatement after thirty (30) days from the date this Order is entered, conditioned upon Respondent having repaid the $30,600 to the Lentz Estate, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Gary Stewart Peklo from the register of attorneys in this Court, and shall certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of Maryland and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 A.3d 1262, 443 Md. 230, 2015 Md. LEXIS 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-peklo-md-2015.