Attorney Grievance Commission v. Pavlick
This text of 121 A.3d 139 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Pavlick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Court of Appeals of Maryland, having considered the Joint Petition For Indefinite Suspension By Consent of the Petitioner, Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, and the Respondent, Richard Mark Pavliek, Esquire, it is this 31st day of August, 2015,
ORDERED, that Respondent be, and hereby is, Indefinitely Suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland with a right to reapply no sooner than sixty (60) days from the effective date of his indefinite suspension for violation of Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct 1.15(a), 8.1(b), 8.4(a), 8.4(d), Maryland Rules 16-606.1, 16-607, and 16-609; and it is further,
ORDERED, that Respondent’s indefinite suspension shall become effective on September 30, 2015, pending further Order of this court, and it is further,
ORDERED, that, the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Richard Mark Pavlick, from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-772(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 A.3d 139, 444 Md. 689, 2015 Md. LEXIS 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-pavlick-md-2015.