Attorney Grievance Commission v. O'Toole

844 A.2d 1214, 380 Md. 434, 2004 Md. LEXIS 125
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Attorney Grievance Commission v. O'Toole. Read the opinion of the Court — 379 Md. 595
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided March 22, 2004·No. No. 3·Published

Opinion

ORDER

ROBERT M. BELL, Chief Judge.

The Court having considered the Petition of Thomas O’Toole for Reinstatement and the consent to reinstatement filed thereto by the Attorney Grievance Commission in the above captioned case, it is this 22nd day of March, 2004,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the petition be, and it is hereby, GRANTED, and the petitioner, Thomas O’Toole, is reinstated to the practice of law in this State, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court shall replace the name of Thomas O’Toole upon the register of attorneys entitled to practice law in this State and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Commission v. O'Toole, 844 A.2d 1214, 380 Md. 434, 2004 Md. LEXIS 125 (Md. 2004).

844 A.2d 1214 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. O'Toole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.