Attorney Grievance Commission v. Newman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Newman

604 A.2d 69, 326 Md. 151, 1992 Md. LEXIS 176

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedApril 8, 1992

DocketMisc. (Subtitle BV) No. 22

StatusPublished

This text of 604 A.2d 69 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Newman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Newman, 604 A.2d 69, 326 Md. 151, 1992 Md. LEXIS 176 (Md. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the consent to disbarment from the practice of law filed by Eugene Michael Newman in accord[152]*152anee with Maryland Rule BV12 d 2, and the written recommendation of Bar Counsel, it is this 8th day of April, 1992

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Eugene Michael Newman be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Eugene Michael Newman from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule BV13, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of the consent to disbarment from the practice of law filed by Eugene Michael Newman in accord[152]*152anee with Maryland Rule BV12 d 2, and the written recommendation of Bar Counsel, it is this 8th day of April, 1992

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Eugene Michael Newman be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Eugene Michael Newman from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule BV13, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

604 A.2d 69, 326 Md. 151, 1992 Md. LEXIS 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-newman-md-1992.