Attorney Grievance Commission v. Monoker

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Monoker

626 A.2d 360, 331 Md. 67, 1993 Md. LEXIS 184

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedJune 23, 1993

DocketMisc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 23

StatusPublished

This text of 626 A.2d 360 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Monoker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Monoker, 626 A.2d 360, 331 Md. 67, 1993 Md. LEXIS 184 (Md. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Consent to Disbarment from the practice of law filed by David Monoker, in accordance with Maryland Rule BV12d2, and the written recommendation of Bar Counsel, it is this 23rd day of June, 1993

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that David Monoker, be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of David Monoker, from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule BV13, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Consent to Disbarment from the practice of law filed by David Monoker, in accordance with Maryland Rule BV12d2, and the written recommendation of Bar Counsel, it is this 23rd day of June, 1993

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that David Monoker, be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of David Monoker, from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule BV13, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

626 A.2d 360, 331 Md. 67, 1993 Md. LEXIS 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-monoker-md-1993.