Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mirsky
This text of 155 A.3d 491 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mirsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Steven Edward Mirsky, to indefinitely suspend the Respondent from the practice of law with the right to reapply for admission no sooner than ninety (90) days. The Court *680 having considered the Petition, it is this 22nd day of February, 2017;
ORDERED, that, thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, Respondent, Steven Edward Mirsky, be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for violating Rules 1.15(a) and (b) and 8.4(a) and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct, as then-enumerated; and Maryland Rules 16-606.1, 16-607 and 16-609 as then-enumerated, and it is further
ORDERED, that, thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Steven Edward Mirsky from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-736(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 A.3d 491, 451 Md. 679, 2017 WL 709303, 2017 Md. LEXIS 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-mirsky-md-2017.