Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mirsky

155 A.3d 491, 451 Md. 679, 2017 WL 709303, 2017 Md. LEXIS 86
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedFebruary 22, 2017
Docket93ag/16
StatusPublished

This text of 155 A.3d 491 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mirsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mirsky, 155 A.3d 491, 451 Md. 679, 2017 WL 709303, 2017 Md. LEXIS 86 (Md. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Steven Edward Mirsky, to indefinitely suspend the Respondent from the practice of law with the right to reapply for admission no sooner than ninety (90) days. The Court *680 having considered the Petition, it is this 22nd day of February, 2017;

ORDERED, that, thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, Respondent, Steven Edward Mirsky, be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for violating Rules 1.15(a) and (b) and 8.4(a) and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct, as then-enumerated; and Maryland Rules 16-606.1, 16-607 and 16-609 as then-enumerated, and it is further

ORDERED, that, thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Steven Edward Mirsky from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-736(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 A.3d 491, 451 Md. 679, 2017 WL 709303, 2017 Md. LEXIS 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-mirsky-md-2017.