Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlin

686 A.2d 1103, 344 Md. 372, 1996 Md. LEXIS 154
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided December 27, 1996·No. Misc. (Subtitle BV) No. 55·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the parties’ Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed herein, it is this 27th day of December, 1996,

ORDERED that the Respondent, Thomas J. McLaughlin, be and he hereby is REPRIMANDED for his violations of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct, namely, his failure to maintain adequate communication with clients in violation of [373] Rule 1.4, his failure to timely complete legal matters of clients in violation of Rule 1.3, and his failure to timely respond to the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland regarding these complaints in violation of Rule 8.1; and it is further

ORDERED that the Respondent shall pay to the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland the sum of $1,632.30, the cost of the investigation and prosecution of this matter for which amount judgment is entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, to be paid within nine months of this Order; and it is further

ORDERED that the Respondent’s law practice be monitored under the terms and conditions set forth in the Joint Petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlin, 686 A.2d 1103, 344 Md. 372, 1996 Md. LEXIS 154 (Md. 1996).

686 A.2d 1103 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlin
813 A.2d 1145 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2002)