Attorney Grievance Commission v. McCoy
This text of 708 A.2d 681 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. McCoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent submitted to this Court by Petitioner and Respondent, it is this 22nd day of April, 1998
ORDERED, that the Respondent, Thomas Vincent McCoy, be and hereby is REPRIMANDED for his violations of Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct 1.3, by failing to provide diligent representation to a client, and 1.4(a), by failing to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of the representation and promptly comply with requests for information, and 8.4(a) and (d) by engaging in conduct in violation of the rules of Professional Conduct and engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
708 A.2d 681, 349 Md. 420, 1998 Md. LEXIS 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-mccoy-md-1998.