Attorney Grievance Commission v. McCoy

708 A.2d 681, 349 Md. 420, 1998 Md. LEXIS 562
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided April 22, 1998·No. Misc. Docket (Subtitle AG) No. 79·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent submitted to this Court by Petitioner and Respondent, it is this 22nd day of April, 1998

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Thomas Vincent McCoy, be and hereby is REPRIMANDED for his violations of Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct 1.3, by failing to provide diligent representation to a client, and 1.4(a), by failing to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of the representation and promptly comply with requests for information, and 8.4(a) and (d) by engaging in conduct in violation of the rules of Professional Conduct and engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Commission v. McCoy, 708 A.2d 681, 349 Md. 420, 1998 Md. LEXIS 562 (Md. 1998).

708 A.2d 681 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. McCoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Sheinbein
812 A.2d 981 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2002)