Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mattingly

15 A.3d 282, 418 Md. 370, 2011 Md. LEXIS 143
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMarch 15, 2011
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 76
StatusPublished

This text of 15 A.3d 282 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mattingly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mattingly, 15 A.3d 282, 418 Md. 370, 2011 Md. LEXIS 143 (Md. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, John A. Mattingly, Jr., to suspend the Respondent, by consent, from the practice of law.

The Court having considered the Petition, it is this 15th day of March, 2011,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, John A. Mattingly, Jr., be and he is hereby suspended for a period of ninety (90) days, by consent, from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, and it is further

ORDERED, that the effective date of the Respondent’s suspension is April 1, 2011, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall, on April 1, 2011, remove the name of John A. Mattingly, Jr. from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-772(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 A.3d 282, 418 Md. 370, 2011 Md. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-mattingly-md-2011.