Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mahone

40 A.3d 1038, 425 Md. 343, 2012 WL 987733, 2012 Md. LEXIS 152
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMarch 26, 2012
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 45
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 40 A.3d 1038 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mahone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mahone, 40 A.3d 1038, 425 Md. 343, 2012 WL 987733, 2012 Md. LEXIS 152 (Md. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. Upon review of said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 26th day of March, 2012,

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Willie James Mahone, be, and he is hereby, reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Rules 1.1, 1.15(a), 1.15(d), 1.15(e), and 8.4(d) of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Mahone
40 A.3d 1038 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 A.3d 1038, 425 Md. 343, 2012 WL 987733, 2012 Md. LEXIS 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-mahone-md-2012.