Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mahone
40 A.3d 1038, 425 Md. 343, 2012 WL 987733, 2012 Md. LEXIS 152
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided March 26, 2012·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 45·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ORDER
The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. Upon review of said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 26th day of March, 2012,
ORDERED, that the Respondent, Willie James Mahone, be, and he is hereby, reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Rules 1.1, 1.15(a), 1.15(d), 1.15(e), and 8.4(d) of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mahone, 40 A.3d 1038, 425 Md. 343, 2012 WL 987733, 2012 Md. LEXIS 152 (Md. 2012).
40 A.3d 1038 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mahone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Mahone
40 A.3d 1038 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2012)