Attorney Grievance Commission v. Lieberman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Lieberman

677 A.2d 584, 342 Md. 508, 1996 Md. LEXIS 54

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedJune 10, 1996

DocketMisc. Docket (Subtitle BV), No. 50

StatusPublished

This text of 677 A.2d 584 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Lieberman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Lieberman, 677 A.2d 584, 342 Md. 508, 1996 Md. LEXIS 54 (Md. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Pursuant to Rule BV 16 of the Maryland Rules of Procedure, the Attorney Grievance Commission petitioned the Court for the immediate interim suspension pending appeal of the respondent, Michael A Lieberman, from the practice of law in this State as a result of the respondent’s conviction of violation of Title 18, U.S.C., § 1956 (conspiracy to launder monetary instruments), in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.

After the respondent filed an answer in opposition to the petition, the Court held a hearing. Upon careful consideration of the written and oral arguments of the parties, it is this 10th day of June, 1996,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the petition to suspend attorney be, and it is hereby, DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Pursuant to Rule BV 16 of the Maryland Rules of Procedure, the Attorney Grievance Commission petitioned the Court for the immediate interim suspension pending appeal of the respondent, Michael A Lieberman, from the practice of law in this State as a result of the respondent’s conviction of violation of Title 18, U.S.C., § 1956 (conspiracy to launder monetary instruments), in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.

After the respondent filed an answer in opposition to the petition, the Court held a hearing. Upon careful consideration of the written and oral arguments of the parties, it is this 10th day of June, 1996,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the petition to suspend attorney be, and it is hereby, DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

677 A.2d 584, 342 Md. 508, 1996 Md. LEXIS 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-lieberman-md-1996.