Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kum
This text of 99 A.3d 288 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER.
For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 10th day September, 2014,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Joseph Mua Kum, be, and he is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Joseph Mua Kum from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-760(e), shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the Clerk of this Court, including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-761(b), for which sum judgment is entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against Joseph Mua Kum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 A.3d 288, 440 Md. 30, 2014 Md. LEXIS 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-kum-md-2014.