Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kourtesis

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kourtesis

79 A.3d 931, 435 Md. 473, 2013 WL 6150775, 2013 Md. LEXIS 832

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedNovember 22, 2013

DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 4

StatusPublished

This text of 79 A.3d 931 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kourtesis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kourtesis, 79 A.3d 931, 435 Md. 473, 2013 WL 6150775, 2013 Md. LEXIS 832 (Md. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action, Response to the Show Cause Order of this Court dated March 20, 2013, and Amended Response to the Show Cause Order, and request for interim suspension pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-773(d), with attached certified copy of an Order issued February 14, 2013, by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Case No. 12-BD-074, wherein the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ordered the immediate suspension of Nikolaos Panagiotis Kourtesis from the practice of law in the District of Columbia; and it appearing that Nikolaos Panagiotis Kourtesis is admitted to the Bar of this Court; is this 22nd day of November, 2013.

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Respondent, Nikolaos Panagiotis Kourtesis, be, and he is hereby, indefinitely suspended, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland, pending further order of this Court, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-773(d); and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Nikolaos Panagiotis Kourtesis from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-760(e), shall [474]*474certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the state.

Judge BATTAGLIA did not participate in the consideration of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action, Response to the Show Cause Order of this Court dated March 20, 2013, and Amended Response to the Show Cause Order, and request for interim suspension pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-773(d), with attached certified copy of an Order issued February 14, 2013, by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Case No. 12-BD-074, wherein the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ordered the immediate suspension of Nikolaos Panagiotis Kourtesis from the practice of law in the District of Columbia; and it appearing that Nikolaos Panagiotis Kourtesis is admitted to the Bar of this Court; is this 22nd day of November, 2013.

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Respondent, Nikolaos Panagiotis Kourtesis, be, and he is hereby, indefinitely suspended, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland, pending further order of this Court, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-773(d); and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Nikolaos Panagiotis Kourtesis from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-760(e), shall [474]*474certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the state.

Judge BATTAGLIA did not participate in the consideration of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 A.3d 931, 435 Md. 473, 2013 WL 6150775, 2013 Md. LEXIS 832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-kourtesis-md-2013.