Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kleinsmith

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kleinsmith

66 A.3d 1022, 431 Md. 678, 2013 WL 3010811, 2013 Md. LEXIS 365

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided May 24, 2013·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 15·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This Court having considered the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 24th day of May, 2013,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Philip M. Kleinsmith, Respondent, is hereby reprimanded for professional misconduct in violation of Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.16, 5.3 and 8.4(d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct, corresponding to disciplinary violations for which he was reprimanded by the Supreme Court of Arizona pursuant to an Order filed March 20, 2012.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This Court having considered the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 24th day of May, 2013,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Philip M. Kleinsmith, Respondent, is hereby reprimanded for professional misconduct in violation of Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.16, 5.3 and 8.4(d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct, corresponding to disciplinary violations for which he was reprimanded by the Supreme Court of Arizona pursuant to an Order filed March 20, 2012.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kleinsmith, 66 A.3d 1022, 431 Md. 678, 2013 WL 3010811, 2013 Md. LEXIS 365 (Md. 2013).

Pincite

66 A.3d 1022 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kleinsmith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.