Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kargbo

173 A.3d 151, 456 Md. 248
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedNovember 7, 2017
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 75
StatusPublished

This text of 173 A.3d 151 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kargbo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kargbo, 173 A.3d 151, 456 Md. 248 (Md. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM ORDER

The Court having considered the Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action filed in the above entitled matter in accordance with Md. Rule 19-721, the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law of the Evidentiary hearing in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County before Judge Dorothy M. Engel, the Recommendation for Placement on Inactive Status filed by Bar Counsel and the oral arguments of Bar Counsel and Respondent, it is this 7th day of November, 2017

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent be, and is hereby, placed on inactive status, effective immediately, pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Mariatu Kargbo from the register of attorneys in this Court and shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State in accordance with Md. Rule 19-761(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 A.3d 151, 456 Md. 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-kargbo-md-2017.